Unleashing the Speed: A Head-to-Head Battle Between FlyingPress and WP Rocket

Latest Features of FlyingPress vs WP Rocket

Their list of features continuously evolve, and as FlyingPress was historically faster to issue new functionality, WP Rocket with it’s last major versions (3.18 -> 3.20) added some new improvements.

WP Rocket 3.18.x -> 3.20.x Highlights

• Version 3.18 (released Jan 2025) adds a Self-host Google Fonts feature (so you can host Google Fonts locally with one click).
• Version 3.18 also improved the Delay JavaScript Execution UI, making the exclusions simpler and more intuitive.
• Automatic CSS & JS minification is now enabled by default for new installs​.
• Version 3.18.3 (March 2025) adds enhancements like allowing users to downgrade the Delay JS feature’s script version, and brings back the “Clear Used CSS” quick-action button.
• Versions 3.20+ where mostly about the speed test and bug fixes, nothing major so far.

FlyingPress 5.x Highlights

• FlyingPress recently released version 5.x (v5.0 + in mid-2025) with a major rewrite of documentation and under-the-hood improvements
• Improvements recorded in the v5.x changelog: e.g., “delay selected scripts until user interaction”, “defer loading option to Delay all JavaScript”, reduction in CPU usage during cache preload.
• One review (2025) emphasises FlyingPress’s strong performance for real-user Core Web Vitals, “hosts third-party code locally”, and when paired with its own CDN (FlyingCDN) + edge caching works very well.
• Another review mentions that with FlyingPress + FlyingCDN (which uses a Cloudflare Enterprise backbone) you get excellent TTFB and global performance gains.

Key Updates in FlyingPress vs WP Rocket:

• WP Rocket — Great for a straightforward optimisation workflow; now includes many of the “automated” or “set-and-forget” features (fonts locally, delay JS, minify by default).
  Covers major Core Web Vitals improvements (LCP, INP, etc) via built-in tooling and background processes.
  Still has broad compatibility and many integrations (CDNs, caching, etc).
  
• FlyingPress — Very strong at “hands-on” optimisation, especially where you want fine-control and edge-caching (via FlyingCDN) for distributed audiences.
  Good for agency workflows where you might pair caching + CDN + image optimisation + advanced script-delay control.
  Because it has fewer legacy settings and a more performance-specialised stance, it might require slightly more technical setup compared to “just install and go”.

So, as you can observe, both are quite busy issuing new features and capabilities.

Conclusion: FlyingPress vs WP Rocket

When comparing FlyingPress and WP Rocket, both plugins deliver significant performance improvements for WordPress sites, but each caters to different needs.
To say which one is clearly better is an impossible task, as both (FlyingPress vs WP Rocket) keep evolving over time. And they are close enough to make this one a close call.

Ultimately, I feel that your decision between FlyingPress and WP Rocket should depend on your website’s specific needs, technical comfort level, and budget (if there is more then one license involved). At current prices, FlyingPress is preferable to agencies, as its lower price for unlimited licences is something WP Rocket can’t match any longer.
Both plugins offer excellent support, regular updates, and the ability to improve page load times, ensuring a better user experience and higher search engine rankings.

For users focused on maximum control and global performance, FlyingPress may be the better choice due to its better CDN, while WP Rocket shines as a versatile, user-friendly option for those seeking a hassle-free setup with great results.
They truly are an excellent choice for speeding up your website.

Both (FlyingPress vs WP Rocket) offer a 14-day money-back guarantee, so if you are on the fence, nothing stops you from trying them both. And they are the current pinnacle of speed optimization premium plugins.

And if you are on the LiteSpeed server, I’d recommend LiteSpeed Cache as another worthy opponent to these two. You can read more about it and a little bit more on WP Rocket and FlyingPress on our 3-best-caching-plugins-for-wordpress article.

TLDR: Key Takeaway in FlyingPress vs WP Rocket

• FlyingPress is a great choice for users looking for maximum speed and control, especially when paired with FlyingCDN. It excels in scenarios where image optimization and edge caching are vital.
• WP Rocket provides a smoother setup experience with excellent out-of-the-box optimizations. It’s a solid option for those who want reliable performance improvements without the need for detailed configuration.

Which one will work better on your website? Why don’t you try them both (test them with our free Speed Analyzer plugin — its compare tests functionality works perfectly), and keep the one that works best for you.
Given all the above into consideration, IMO the WP Rocket is more suitable for a regular Joe (only by a few %, due to its better support), and FlyingPress for agencies that need unlimited licences. That being said, both are excellent choices, and you can’t go wrong with either of FlyingPress vs WP Rocket.

For maximum speed gains, no matter which of those plugins you choose, I’d always pair them up with Perfmatters. Perfmatters offers something those two don’t have — easy code unloading and some other functions you can read about in my ultimate guide for Perfmatters.

If you got all the way down here, you probably know that having an ultimate cache plugin doesn’t mean much if your web host is inadequate, and you might appreciate our WordPress Hosting Services Compared article.

And if you’d like someone reliable to take care of your website — a complete service that ranges from speed optimization, SEO, maintenance, and troubleshooting to hosting solutions — feel free to contact us.